- In Costa Rica, climate change and habitat conversion threaten the same species and favor the same species
- Earth may be losing global biodiversity faster than previously thought
- Trend could help focus conservation efforts
Climate change and habitat conversion to agriculture are working together to homogenize nature, indicates a study in the journal Global Change Biology led by the University of California, Davis.
In other words, the more things change, the more they are the same.
While the individual impacts of climate change and habitat conversion on wildlife are well-recognized, little is known about how species respond to both stressors at once.
In northwest Costa Rica, the study’s authors surveyed birds and plants at 120 sites that included rainforests, dry forests and farmland to determine how habitat conversion and climate-change-induced droughts affect tropical wildlife. They found that different bird species thrive in drier versus wetter areas of forests. In farmlands however, birds associated with dry sites were found everywhere, even in the wettest sites.
“Across Central and South America, we are seeing large areas being converted from native forest to agriculture, and droughts are becoming more frequent,” said lead author Daniel Karp, an assistant professor in the UC Davis Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology. “Both of these global pressures are favoring the same species and threatening the same species. This means we may be losing biodiversity faster than we previously thought when we were studying climate change and habitat conversion individually.”
Karp said the most vulnerable birds at the study sites were those in the wet forests, which include tropical birds like tanagers, manakins and woodcreepers. He noted that birds in the agricultural sites — such as blackbirds, doves and sparrows — were more similar to those found in the dry forest, where there is less of a tree canopy and more grass cover.
Focus on conservation
“Now that we know this, we know what to focus on from a conservation perspective,” Karp said.
To help retain high levels of biodiversity, land managers could target for protection areas of wetter forests that are expected to stay wet in the future. Conservation dollars could also focus on wet-forest species that are particularly sensitive to habitat conversion and climate change. Another option is to incentivize private landowners in wet regions to create or maintain patches of forests near or within their farms to better balance food production and biodiversity.
Co-authoring institutions include the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, University of Toronto, the Unión de Ornitólogos de Costa Rica, and the Museo Nacional de Costa Rica.
The study was funded by the Killam Fellowships Program, University of British Columbia, University of Toronto, Canada Research Chairs Program, FuturAgua, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Daniel Karp, UC Davis Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, 530-219-9868, firstname.lastname@example.org
Kat Kerlin, UC Davis News and Media Relations, 530-750-9195, email@example.com